UFOs AND HUMAN MUTILATIONS

“SPACE BROTHERS?” “ANGELS?”

MUTILATION & MURDER Not Just For Cattle Anymore

cattleMutilation

The game has changed.

It seems not all UFO inhabitants are of the soft and fluffy, touchy-feely, ET or Close Encounters kind. Some of them are clearly malign, indeed fatal to us . . . and worse.

Worse than fatal? You decide.

Consider the now infamous Guarapiranga Reservoir (Brazil) case of 1988. This outrage has received little coverage in the U.S. media, though the Internet has been giving it increasing focus over the years. As originally reported by Brazilian Ufologist Ms. Encarnacion Garcia, the most shocking aspect (besides the actual mutilations suffered by the victim) is how similar these injuries are to the countless cattle mutilation cases in the U.S. over the past several decades. Just a few of these similarities include:

  • The body, although extremely mutilated, showed no signs of struggle or the use of restraints.
  • The body appeared to be in an otherwise good condition (no obvious illness or other injury).
  • Rigor mortis had not set in and it was estimated that the victim had been killed approximately 48 to 72 hours previously.
  • There were no signs of animal predation or decay which might be expected.
  • Strangely, there was no odor to the body.
  • Bleeding from the wounds had been minimal. (In fact, it was noted that there was a general lack of blood found in the body or on the ground around the body.)
  • Police photos show that the flesh and lips had been removed from around the mouth, as is common in cattle and other animal mutilations.

{“It is a carbon copy of the surgery seen in so

many UFO-related animal mutilation cases.”}

From the website www.think-aboutit.com:  “An autopsy report stated that ‘the eyes and ears were also removed and the mouth cavity was emptied.’ Removal of these body parts, including the tongue as here, is common enough in animal mutilation cases.” (Ed.- But in humans?)  The page continues:

“The ‘surgery’ appeared to have been done by someone familiar with surgical procedures. The lack of profuse bleeding suggested the use of a laser-like instrument producing heat, thus immediately cauterizing the edge of the wounds. The autopsy report states that, ‘The axillary regions on both sides showed soft spots where organs had been removed. Incisions were made on the face, internal thorax, abdomen, legs, arms, and chest. Shoulders and arms have perforations of 1 to 1.5 inches in diameter where tissue and muscles were extracted. The edges of the perforations were uniform and so was their size. The chest had shrunk due to the removal of internal organs.’                          

“‘You also find the removal of the belly button leaving a 1.5 inch hole in the abdomen and a depressed abdominal cavity showing the removal of the intestines.’ The report also noted the victim’s scrotum had been removed, and that the anal orifice had been cored out, leaving an incision of about 3 to 6 inches in diameter.

“It is significant that the police and medical examiners were convinced the holes found in the head, arms, stomach, anus and legs were not produced by bullet wounds. What is most disturbing about the anal incision and the extraction of anal and digestive tract tissue is that it is a carbon copy of the surgery seen in so many UFO-related animal mutilation cases.”

All the info above courtesy of www.think-aboutit.com. For further coverage of this and other human mutilation cases, please see Mauro Porto’s excellent reportage at http://www.reocities.com/aliengrip/Mutilations/Guarapiranga2-En.htm. Original text and photos courtesy of http://usuarios.uninet.com.br/~mfpporto/CAUTIOUS%20ABOUT%20ETs.htm

But be warned: the photos of the victim are extremely graphic and disturbing. Don’t view them unless you’re sure you can stand the sight of a mutilated human corpse.

Advertisements